Rilwan Aikawa of the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos, to admit the
account statement of a former Minister of Aviation, Mr. Femi
Fani-Kayode, at Zenith Bank Plc, as an exhibit in the ongoing criminal
EFCC, through its counsel, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, made the application
at the continuation of trial Mr. Fani-Kayode, a former Minister of State
for Finance, Mrs. Esther Nenadi Usman, one Danjuma Yusuf and a company,
John Trust Dimensions Nigeria Limited, over alleged N4.6 billion fraud
Mr. Tosin Owobo, an Operative of EFCC, had in his testimony told the
court that upon a request, the former minister’s statement of account at
Zenith Bank Plc was forwarded to the anti-graft agency.
Narrating how the statement was generated, the witness said: “When
the request was received, it was sent to the Information Technology
Department and it will be printed in the presence of a compliance
“The printed statement was then compared with entries in the bank’s
computer system. Afterwards, a certificate of identification was
produced and signed accordingly.
Mr. Oyedepo, then sought the admittance of the accused person’s
statement of account number, 1004735721, in the name of Femi
Fani-Kayode, which contained entries from January 22, 2015 to July 31,
2015, as an exhibit before the court.
However, in his objection to the admissibility of the document,
Mr. Fani-Kayode’s lawyer, Norrison Quakers (SAN), said it did not comply
with the provisions of Section 89 (H) and 90 (E) (1-IV) of the Evidence
The counsel further argued that the document cannot be said to have
emanated from the bank because none of its officers had certified it. He
added that the EFCC is in no position to do the verification of the
Responding, EFCC’s lawyer, Mr. Oyedepo, said the objection of Mr.
Quakers misconceived provisions Section 89 (H) and 90 (E) (1-IV) of the
He was of the view that the certification that was contemplated for
the admissibility of a bankers’ book must either be given orally or
through affidavit by an officer of the bank.
“The witness, orally and on oath, had certified the document. He
needs not put his designation. The document is extremely relevant to the
charge before the court, particularly, with regards to counts 1 to 15
of the charge,” MR. Oyedepo said.
After listening to the submissions of parties in the matter, Justice
Aikawa adjourned to December 5 for ruling on the document’s
admissibility and continuation of trial.